Implications

This non-implication, Form 182 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 262, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 2353, whose string of implications is:
    31 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 \(\Rightarrow\) 104 \(\Rightarrow\) 182
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 125, Form 31 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 13 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 31 <p>\(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): <strong>The countable union theorem:</strong>  The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 13 <p> Every Dedekind finite subset of \({\Bbb R}\) is finite. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 8426, whose string of implications is:
    262 \(\Rightarrow\) 255 \(\Rightarrow\) 260 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 \(\Rightarrow\) 13

The conclusion Form 182 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 262 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M1\) Cohen's original model Add a denumerable number of generic reals (subsets of \(\omega\)), \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(\cdots\), along with the set \(b\) containing them

Edit | Back