Implications

This non-implication, Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 382, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 10221, whose string of implications is:
    43 \(\Rightarrow\) 211
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 66, Form 43 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 382 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 43 <p> \(DC(\omega)\) (DC), <strong>Principle of Dependent Choices:</strong> If \(S\)  is  a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\)  then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\).  See <a href="/articles/Tarski-1948">Tarski [1948]</a>, p 96, <a href="/articles/Levy-1964">Levy [1964]</a>, p. 136. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 382 <p> <strong>DUMN</strong>:  The disjoint union of metrizable spaces is normal. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 382 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N57\) The set of atoms \(A=\cup\{A_{n}:n\in\aleph_{1}\}\), where\(A_{n}=\{a_{nx}:x\in B(0,1)\}\) and \(B(0,1)\) is the set of points on theunit circle centered at 0 The group of permutations \(\cal{G}\) is thegroup of all permutations on \(A\) which rotate the \(A_{n}\)'s by an angle\(\theta_{n}\in\Bbb{R}\) and supports are countable

Edit | Back