This non-implication,
Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \)
Form 393,
whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Hypothesis | Statement |
---|---|
Form 43 | <p> \(DC(\omega)\) (DC), <strong>Principle of Dependent Choices:</strong> If \(S\) is a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\) then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\). See <a href="/articles/Tarski-1948">Tarski [1948]</a>, p 96, <a href="/articles/Levy-1964">Levy [1964]</a>, p. 136. </p> |
Conclusion | Statement |
---|---|
Form 330 | <p> \(MC(WO,WO)\): For every well ordered set \(X\) of well orderable sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-67">Form 67</a>.) </p> |
The conclusion Form 211 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 393 then follows.
Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:
Name | Statement |
---|---|
\(\cal N15\) Brunner/Howard Model I | \(A=\{a_{i,\alpha}: i\in\omega\wedge\alpha\in\omega_1\}\) |