This non-implication,
Form 216 \( \not \Rightarrow \)
Form 77,
whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Hypothesis | Statement |
---|---|
Form 9 | <p>Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) <a href="/books/8">Jech [1973b]</a>: \(E(I,IV)\) <a href="/articles/Howard-Yorke-1989">Howard/Yorke [1989]</a>): Every Dedekind finite set is finite. </p> |
Conclusion | Statement |
---|---|
Form 77 | <p> A linear ordering of a set \(P\) is a well ordering if and only if \(P\) has no infinite descending sequences. <a href="/books/8">Jech [1973b]</a>, p 23. </p> |
The conclusion Form 216 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 77 then follows.
Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:
Name | Statement |
---|---|
\(\cal N10\) Höft/Howard/Mostowski Model | (The model is a variation of\(\cal N3\).) \(A\) as ordered by \(\precsim\) has the same order type as therationals; \(\cal G\) is the group of all order automorphisms of \(A\); \(S\) isthe set of all subsets \(E\) of \(A\) that satisfy the following threeconditions:\item{1.} \(E\) is well ordered by \(\precsim\).\item{2.} \(E\) is bounded in \(A\).\item{3.} If \(b:\alpha\to E\) is an order preserving bijection from\(\alpha\) onto \(E\) and if \(\lambda < \alpha\) is a limit ordinal then\(\{b(\beta) : \beta < \gamma\}\) has no least upper bound in\((A,\precsim)\).\par\noindentIn <a href="/articles/H\"oft/Howard-1994">H\"oft/Howard [1994]</a> it is shown that, in \(\cal N10\), everyDedekind finite set is finite (9 is true), but \((A,\precsim)\) is alinearly ordered set with no infinite descending sequences that cannot bewell ordered (77 is false) |