Implications

This non-implication, Form 0 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 394, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 849, Form 0 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 119 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 0  \(0 = 0\).

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 119 <p> <strong>van Douwen's choice principle:</strong> \(C(\aleph_{0}\),uniformly orderable with order type of the integers): Suppose \(\{ A_{i}: i\in\omega\}\) is a set and there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(i\in\omega,\ f(i)\) is an ordering of \(A_{i}\) of type \(\omega^{*}+\omega\) (the usual ordering of the integers), then \(\{A_{i}: i\in\omega\}\) has a choice function. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 7648, whose string of implications is:
    394 \(\Rightarrow\) 165 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 \(\Rightarrow\) 119

The conclusion Form 0 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 394 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N2(\hbox{LO})\) van Douwen's Model This model is another variationof \(\cal N2\)

Edit | Back