This non-implication,
Form 249 \( \not \Rightarrow \)
Form 151,
whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Hypothesis | Statement |
---|---|
Form 122 | <p> \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. </p> |
Conclusion | Statement |
---|---|
Form 151 | <p> \(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see <a href="/notes/note-27">note 27</a> for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).) </p> |
The conclusion Form 249 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 151 then follows.
Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:
Name | Statement |
---|---|
\(\cal M1(\langle\omega_1\rangle)\) Cohen/Pincus Model | Pincus extends the methods of Cohen and adds a generic \(\omega_1\)-sequence, \(\langle I_{\alpha}: \alpha\in\omega_1\rangle\), of denumerable sets, where \(I_0\) is a denumerable set of generic reals, each \(I_{\alpha+1}\) is a generic set of enumerations of \(I_{\alpha}\), and for a limit ordinal \(\lambda\),\(I_{\lambda}\) is a generic set of choice functions for \(\{I_{\alpha}:\alpha \le \lambda\}\) |
\(\cal M29\) Pincus' Model II | Pincus constructs a generic extension \(M[I]\) of a model \(M\) of \(ZF +\) class choice \(+ GCH\) in which \(I=\bigcup_{n\in\omega}I_n\), \(I_{-1}=2\) and \(I_{n+1}\) is a denumerable set of independent functions from \(\omega\) onto \(I_n\) |
\(\cal M43\) Pincus' Model V | This is the model of <a href="/articles/Pincus-1977a">Pincus [1977a]</a>, Theorem 2.1 \((A)\) |
\(\cal M44\) Pincus' Model VI | This is the model of <a href="/articles/Pincus-1977a">Pincus [1977a]</a>, Theorem 2.1 \((B)\) |
\(\cal M45\) Pincus' Model VII | This is the model of <a href="/articles/Pincus-1977a">Pincus [1977a]</a>, Theorem 2.1 \((C)\) |
\(\cal N15\) Brunner/Howard Model I | \(A=\{a_{i,\alpha}: i\in\omega\wedge\alpha\in\omega_1\}\) |