Implications

This non-implication, Form 87-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 40, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 982, Form 87-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 122 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 87-alpha <p> \(DC(\aleph_{\alpha})\): Given a relation \(R\) such that for every subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(|Y|<\aleph_{\alpha}\), there is an \(x\in X\) with \(Y\mathrel R x\) then there is a function \(f:\aleph_{\alpha}\to X\) such that (\(\forall\beta < \aleph_{\alpha}\)) \(\{f(\gamma): \gamma < \beta\}\mathrel R f(\beta)\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 122 <p> \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 10201, whose string of implications is:
    40 \(\Rightarrow\) 122

The conclusion Form 87-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 40 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N2(\aleph_{\alpha})\) Jech's Model This is an extension of \(\cal N2\) in which \(A=\{a_{\gamma} : \gamma\in\omega_{\alpha}\}\); \(B\) is the corresponding set of \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) pairs of elements of \(A\); \(\cal G\)is the group of all permutations on \(A\) that leave \(B\) point-wise fixed;and \(S\) is the set of all subsets of \(A\) of cardinality less than\(\aleph_{\alpha}\)

Edit | Back