Implications

This non-implication, Form 92 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 66, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 3513, whose string of implications is:
    40 \(\Rightarrow\) 337 \(\Rightarrow\) 92
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 1331, Form 40 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 329 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 40 <p> \(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. <a href="/books/2">Moore, G. [1982]</a>, p 325. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 329 <p> \(MC(\infty,WO)\): For  every set \(M\) of well orderable sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\).  (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-67">Form 67</a>.) </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 4896, whose string of implications is:
    66 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 329

The conclusion Form 92 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 66 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N33\) Howard/H\.Rubin/J\.Rubin Model \(A\) is countably infinite;\(\precsim\) is a dense linear ordering on \(A\) without first or lastelements (\((A,\precsim) \cong (\Bbb Q,\le)\)); \(\cal G\) is the group of allorder automorphisms on \((A,\precsim)\); and \(S\) is the set of all boundedsubsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back