Implications

This non-implication, Form 93 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 106, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 10172, whose string of implications is:
    170 \(\Rightarrow\) 93
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 852, Form 170 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 5 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 170 <p> \(\aleph_{1}\le 2^{\aleph_{0}}\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 5 <p> \(C(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 7274, whose string of implications is:
    106 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 \(\Rightarrow\) 94 \(\Rightarrow\) 5

The conclusion Form 93 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 106 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M6\) Sageev's Model I Using iterated forcing, Sageev constructs \(\cal M6\) by adding a denumerable number of generic tree-like structuresto the ground model, a model of \(ZF + V = L\)

Edit | Back