Implications

This non-implication, Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 49, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 1072, Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 146 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 325 <p> <strong>Ramsey's Theorem II:</strong> \(\forall n,m\in\omega\), if A is an infinite set and the family of all \(m\) element subsets of \(A\) is partitioned into \(n\) sets \(S_{j}, 1\le j\le n\), then there is an infinite subset \(B\subseteq A\) such that all \(m\) element subsets of \(B\) belong to the same \(S_{j}\). (Also, see <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-17">Form 17</a>.) </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 146 <p> \(A(F,A1)\): For every \(T_2\) topological space \((X,T)\), if \(X\) is a continuous finite to one image of an A1 space then \((X,T)\) is  an A1 space. (\((X,T)\) is A1 means if \(U \subseteq  T\) covers \(X\) then \(\exists f : X\rightarrow U\) such that \((\forall x\in X) (x\in f(x)).)\) </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 2073, whose string of implications is:
    49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 \(\Rightarrow\) 146

The conclusion Form 325 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 49 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N1\) The Basic Fraenkel Model The set of atoms, \(A\) is denumerable; \(\cal G\) is the group of all permutations on \(A\); and \(S\) isthe set of all finite subsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back