Implications

This non-implication, Form 104 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 90, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 2697, whose string of implications is:
    40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 27 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 \(\Rightarrow\) 104
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 214, Form 40 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 222 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 40 <p> \(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. <a href="/books/2">Moore, G. [1982]</a>, p 325. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 222 <p> There is a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(\omega)\). </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6556, whose string of implications is:
    90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 \(\Rightarrow\) 70 \(\Rightarrow\) 222

The conclusion Form 104 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 90 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M2\) Feferman's model Add a denumerable number of generic reals to the base model, but do not collect them

Edit | Back