Implications

This non-implication, Form 71-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 149, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9777, whose string of implications is:
    87-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 71-alpha
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 1054, Form 87-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 144 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 87-alpha <p> \(DC(\aleph_{\alpha})\): Given a relation \(R\) such that for every subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(|Y|<\aleph_{\alpha}\), there is an \(x\in X\) with \(Y\mathrel R x\) then there is a function \(f:\aleph_{\alpha}\to X\) such that (\(\forall\beta < \aleph_{\alpha}\)) \(\{f(\gamma): \gamma < \beta\}\mathrel R f(\beta)\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 144 <p> Every set is almost well orderable. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 5153, whose string of implications is:
    149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 144

The conclusion Form 71-alpha \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 149 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M40(\kappa)\) Pincus' Model IV The ground model \(\cal M\), is a model of \(ZF +\) the class form of \(AC\)

Edit | Back