Implications

This non-implication, Form 111 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 68, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9929, whose string of implications is:
    250 \(\Rightarrow\) 111
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 252, Form 250 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 249 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 250 <p> \((\forall n\in\omega-\{0,1\})(C(WO,n))\): For every natural number \(n\ge 2\), every well ordered family of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 249 <p> If \(T\) is an infinite tree in which every element has exactly 2 immediate successors then \(T\) has an infinite branch. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 4391, whose string of implications is:
    68 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 \(\Rightarrow\) 249

The conclusion Form 111 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 68 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N35\) Truss' Model IV The set of atoms, \(A\), is denumerable andeach element of \(A\) is associated with a finite sequence of zeros andones

Edit | Back