This non-implication, Form 118 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 292, whose code is 4, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 3. In this case, it's Code 3: 92, Form 118 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 79 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 118 <p> Every linearly orderable topological space is normal.  <a href="/books/28">Birkhoff [1967]</a>, p 241. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 79 <p> \({\Bbb R}\) can be well ordered.  <a href="/articles/hilbert-1900">Hilbert [1900]</a>, p 263. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6708, whose string of implications is:
    292 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79

The conclusion Form 118 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 292 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal M1\) Cohen's original model Add a denumerable number of generic reals (subsets of \(\omega\)), \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(\cdots\), along with the set \(b\) containing them

Edit | Back