Implications

This non-implication, Form 263 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 76, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 568, Form 263 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 76 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 263 <p> \(H(AS\&C,P)\): Every every relation \((X,R)\) which is antisymmetric and connected contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered subset. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 76 <p> \(MC_\omega(\infty,\infty)\) (\(\omega\)-MC): For every family \(X\) of pairwise disjoint non-empty sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for each \(x\in X\), f(x) is a non-empty countable subset of \(x\). </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 263 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 76 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N1\) The Basic Fraenkel Model The set of atoms, \(A\) is denumerable; \(\cal G\) is the group of all permutations on \(A\); and \(S\) isthe set of all finite subsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back