Implications

This non-implication, Form 289 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 304, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6819, whose string of implications is:
    164 \(\Rightarrow\) 91 \(\Rightarrow\) 79 \(\Rightarrow\) 289
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 446, Form 164 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 304 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 164 <p> Every non-well-orderable set has an infinite subset with a Dedekind finite power set. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 304 <p> There does not exist a \(T_2\) topological space \(X\) such that every infinite subset of \(X\) contains an infinite compact subset. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 289 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 304 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N3\) Mostowski's Linearly Ordered Model \(A\) is countably infinite;\(\precsim\) is a dense linear ordering on \(A\) without first or lastelements (\((A,\precsim) \cong (\Bbb Q,\le)\)); \(\cal G\) is the group of allorder automorphisms on \((A,\precsim)\); and \(S\) is the set of all finitesubsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back