This non-implication, Form 91 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 238, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 221, Form 91 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 238 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 91 <p> \(PW\):  The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 238 <p> Every elementary Abelian group (that is, for some prime \(p\) every non identity element has order \(p\)) is the direct sum of cyclic subgroups. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 91 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 238 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N32\) Hickman's Model III This is a variation of \(\cal N1\)

Edit | Back