This non-implication, Form 317 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 635, Form 317 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 317 <p> <strong>Weak Sikorski Theorem:</strong>  If \(B\) is a complete, well orderable Boolean algebra and \(f\) is a homomorphism of the Boolean algebra \(A'\) into \(B\) where \(A'\) is a subalgebra of the Boolean algebra \(A\), then \(f\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B\).

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 291 <p> For all infinite \(x\), \(|x!|=|x^x|\). </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 317 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N29\) Dawson/Howard Model Let \(A=\bigcup\{B_n; n\in\omega\}\) is a disjoint union, where each \(B_n\) is denumerable and ordered like the rationals by \(\le_n\)

Edit | Back