Implications

This non-implication, Form 322 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 151, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 641, Form 322 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 10 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 322 <p> \(KW(WO,\infty)\), <strong>The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of sets:</strong> For every  well ordered set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).  (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-15">Form 15</a>). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 10 <p> \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 7483, whose string of implications is:
    151 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 \(\Rightarrow\) 10

The conclusion Form 322 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 151 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N50(E)\) Brunner's Model III \(E\) is a finite set of prime numbers.For each \(p\in E\) and \(n\in\omega\), let \(A_{p,n}\) be a set of atoms ofcardinality \(p^n\)

Edit | Back