Implications

• Implications Home
• Complete List
• Search

This non-implication, Form 324 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 153, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

• An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9967, whose string of implications is: 322 \(\Rightarrow\) 324
• A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 641, Form 322 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 10 whose summary information is:
  

  Hypothesis	Statement
  Form 322	<p> \(KW(WO,\infty)\), <strong>The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of sets:</strong> For every  well ordered set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).  (See <a href="/form-classes/howard-rubin-15">Form 15</a>). </p>

  
  

  Conclusion	Statement
  Form 10	<p> \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. </p>

  
  
• An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9673, whose string of implications is: 153 \(\Rightarrow\) 10

The conclusion Form 324 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 153 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name	Statement
\(\cal N50(E)\) Brunner's Model III	\(E\) is a finite set of prime numbers.For each \(p\in E\) and \(n\in\omega\), let \(A_{p,n}\) be a set of atoms ofcardinality \(p^n\)