Implications

This non-implication, Form 345 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 133, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 706, Form 345 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 118 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 345 <p> <strong>Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom:</strong>  If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 118 <p> Every linearly orderable topological space is normal.  <a href="/books/28">Birkhoff [1967]</a>, p 241. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6536, whose string of implications is:
    133 \(\Rightarrow\) 90 \(\Rightarrow\) 118

The conclusion Form 345 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 133 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N40\) Howard/Rubin Model II A variation of \(\cal N38\)

Edit | Back