Implications

This non-implication, Form 374-n \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 239, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 1239, whose string of implications is:
    133 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 \(\Rightarrow\) 423 \(\Rightarrow\) 374-n
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 347, Form 133 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 127 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 133  <p> Every set is either well orderable or has an infinite amorphous subset. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 127 <p> An amorphous power of a compact \(T_2\) space, which as a set is well orderable, is well orderable. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 7993, whose string of implications is:
    239 \(\Rightarrow\) 427 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 \(\Rightarrow\) 83 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 \(\Rightarrow\) 127

The conclusion Form 374-n \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 239 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N24\) Hickman's Model I This model is a variation of \(\cal N2\)

Edit | Back