Implications

This non-implication, Form 395 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 69, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 10033, whose string of implications is:
    112 \(\Rightarrow\) 395
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 257, Form 112 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 69 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 112 <p> \(MC(\infty,LO)\): For every family \(X\) of non-empty sets each of which can be linearly ordered there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in X\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty finite subset of \(y\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 69 <p> Every field has an algebraic closure.  <a href="/books/8">Jech [1973b]</a>, p 13. <p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 395 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 69 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N1\) The Basic Fraenkel Model The set of atoms, \(A\) is denumerable; \(\cal G\) is the group of all permutations on \(A\); and \(S\) isthe set of all finite subsets of \(A\)

Edit | Back