This non-implication, Form 24 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this first code 2/1 implication.
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 97, Form 24 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 24 <p> \(C(\aleph_0,2^{(2^{\aleph_0})})\): Every denumerable collection of non-empty sets each with power \(2^{(2^{\aleph_{0}})}\) has a choice function. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 291 <p> For all infinite \(x\), \(|x!|=|x^x|\). </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 24 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 291 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N29\) Dawson/Howard Model Let \(A=\bigcup\{B_n; n\in\omega\}\) is a disjoint union, where each \(B_n\) is denumerable and ordered like the rationals by \(\le_n\)

Edit | Back