Implications

This non-implication, Form 119 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 149, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:
Note: This non-implication is actually a code 4, as this non-implication satisfies the transferability criterion. Click Transfer details for all the details)

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 1894, whose string of implications is:
    23 \(\Rightarrow\) 27 \(\Rightarrow\) 31 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 \(\Rightarrow\) 119
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 50, Form 23 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 127 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 23 <p> \((\forall \alpha)(UT(\aleph_{\alpha},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): For every ordinal \(\alpha\), if \(A\) and every member of \(A\) has cardinality \(\aleph_{\alpha}\), then \(|\bigcup A| = \aleph _{\alpha }\). </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 127 <p> An amorphous power of a compact \(T_2\) space, which as a set is well orderable, is well orderable. </p>

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 6262, whose string of implications is:
    149 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 \(\Rightarrow\) 126 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 \(\Rightarrow\) 83 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 \(\Rightarrow\) 127

The conclusion Form 119 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 149 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N24\) Hickman's Model I This model is a variation of \(\cal N2\)

Edit | Back