Implications

This non-implication, Form 125 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 51, whose code is 6, is constructed around a proven non-implication as follows:

  • An (optional) implication of code 1 or code 2 is given. In this case, it's Code 2: 9639, whose string of implications is:
    144 \(\Rightarrow\) 125
  • A proven non-implication whose code is 5. In this case, it's Code 3: 407, Form 144 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 51 whose summary information is:
    Hypothesis Statement
    Form 144 <p> Every set is almost well orderable. </p>

    Conclusion Statement
    Form 51 <p> <strong>Cofinality Principle:</strong> Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering.  <a href="/articles/Sierpi\'nski-1918">Sierpi\'nski [1918]</a>, p 117. </p>

  • This non-implication was constructed without the use of this last code 2/1 implication

The conclusion Form 125 \( \not \Rightarrow \) Form 51 then follows.

Finally, the
List of models where hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false:

Name Statement
\(\cal N37\) A variation of Blass' model, \(\cal N28\) Let \(A=\{a_{i,j}:i\in\omega, j\in\Bbb Z\}\)
\(\cal N41\) Another variation of \(\cal N3\) \(A=\bigcup\{B_n; n\in\omega\}\)is a disjoint union, where each \(B_n\) is denumerable and ordered like therationals by \(\le_n\)

Edit | Back