Cohen \(\cal M43\): Pincus' Model V | Back to this models page
Description: This is the model of Pincus [1977a], Theorem 2.1 \((A)\)
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be true in this model:
Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
43 | \(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\) is a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\) then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\). See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136. |
62 | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
214 | \(Z(\omega)\): For every family \(A\) of infinite sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in A\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty subset of \(y\) and \(|f(y)|=\aleph_{0}\). |
When the book was first being written, only the following form classes were known to be false in this model:
Form Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
30 | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
67 | \(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite). |
91 | \(PW\): The power set of a well ordered set can be well ordered. |
99 | Rado's Selection Lemma: Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\). Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S. |
133 | Every set is either well orderable or has an infinite amorphous subset. |
151 | \(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see note 27 for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).) |
163 | Every non-well-orderable set has an infinite, Dedekind finite subset. |
328 | \(MC(WO,\infty)\): For every well ordered set \(X\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that and for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). (See Form 67.) |
329 | \(MC(\infty,WO)\): For every set \(M\) of well orderable sets such that for all \(x\in X\), \(|x|\ge 1\), there is a function \(f\) such that for every \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). (See Form 67.) |
Historical background: (A). It uses Pincus' general method foradding dependent choice (43). Beginning with a model \(\cal M\) of ZF +``The class form of choice'', Pincus adds three generic \(\omega_1\)sequences: \(\langle I_\alpha:\alpha<\omega_1\rangle\), \(\langleA_\alpha:\alpha< \omega_1\rangle\) and \(\langle\frak A_\alpha:\alpha<\omega_1\rangle\). The sets \(I_\alpha\), \(\alpha < \omega_1\) areobtained as in \(\cal M1(\langle\omega_1\rangle)\), \(A_\alpha\) is a genericset of disjoint subsets of \(I_\alpha\) and \(\frak A_\alpha\) is agenerically added universal homogeneous structure for the theory offinite choice operators with domain \(A_\alpha\). (See Pincus [1977a] for definitions.) In Pincus [1977a], it is shownthat in \(\cal M43\) Dependent Choice (43) is true, \(C(\infty,<\aleph_0)\)(62) is true, ``For every collection \(A\) of sets each of which hascardinality at least \(\aleph_0\), there is a function \(f\) with domain \(A\)such that \(\forall x\in A\), \(f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(|f(x)| = \aleph_0\).''(214) is true but the Ordering Principle (30) is false.
Back