Description: We give some definitions and properties of inaccessible cardinals. (Proofs of the results given below can be found in Drake [1974].)
Content:
We give some definitions and properties of inaccessible cardinals. (Proofs of the results given below can be found in Drake [1974].)
Definition: A cardinal \(\kappa\) is (strongly) inaccessible if \(\kappa\) is regular and for all \(\mu < \kappa\),\(2^{\mu} < \kappa\). (An inaccessible cardinal is also called a strong limit cardinal.)
Lemma: No successor cardinal, \(\aleph_{\alpha+1}\), is inaccessible. (This is [0 AJ].)
Definition: \(\mu\) is called a 2-valued,\(\kappa\)-additive (complete) measure on \(x\) if \(\mu\) is a function from \(x\) to \(\{0,1\}\) such that
(The measure is called non-trivial if the measure of a one-element set is 0.)
Definition: A cardinal \(\kappa\) is said to bemeasurable if \(\kappa > \aleph_0\) and \(\kappa\) has a 2-valued \(\kappa\)-additive non-trivial measure.
Theorem: (\(ZFC\)) Every measurable cardinal is inaccessible. (Form 319.)Definition: A filter is \(\kappa\)-additive (complete)if the intersection of \(<\kappa\) members of the filter is in the filter.
Theorem: A cardinal \(\kappa\) is measurable iff there is a non-principal ultrafilter on \(\kappa\) which is\(\kappa\)-additive.
Definition: A measure \(\mu\) on \(\kappa\) is normal if \(\mu\) is a non-trivial \(\kappa\)-additive measure on \(\kappa\)such that for any function \(f: \kappa\to\kappa\) that is regressive (i.e., such that \(f(\alpha)<\alpha\) for all \(\alpha<\kappa\),\(\alpha\ne 0\)) there is a \(\beta<\kappa\) such that \(\mu(\{\alpha<\kappa: f(\alpha)=\beta\})=1\) (i.e., every regressive function on \(\kappa\) is constant on a set of measure 1).Definition: If \(X= \langle X_{\alpha}:\alpha <\kappa\rangle\) is\(\kappa\)-sequence of subsets of \(\kappa\), the diagonal intersection, \(D(X)=\bigcap_{\alpha<\kappa}(X_{\alpha}\cup\alpha+1)=\{\beta<\kappa:\forall\alpha<\beta(\beta\in X_{\alpha}\}\).
Lemma: \(\mu\) is normal iff the diagonal intersection of any \(\kappa\)-sequence of sets of measure 1 is also of measure 1.Theorem: (\(ZFC\)) If \(\kappa\) is measurable then \(\kappa\)has a normal measure.
Definition: If \(\kappa\) and \(\lambda\) are cardinals,\(\cal L_{\kappa,\lambda}\) is the language obtained by adding infinite conjunctions and disjunctions of cardinality less than\(\kappa\) and infinite quantifications of blocks of variables of cardinal less than \(\lambda\). (The ordinary first-order language is equivalent to \(\cal L_{\omega,\omega}\).)
Definition:
Theorem: (\(ZFC\)) If \(\kappa\) is inaccessible, then \(\kappa\)is weakly compact iff \(\kappa\to (\kappa)^2\).
Lemma: (\(ZFC\)) Every measurable cardinal is weakly compact.
Bull [1978] defines a measurable cardinal as acardinal that has a normal measure. With this definition, \(ZF\) \(\vdash\) Every measurable cardinal is weakly compact.)
Theorem: (\(ZFC\)) If \(\kappa\) is a regular infinite cardinal,\(\kappa\) is strongly compact iff for any \(\kappa\)-complete filter \(J\)on a set \(X\), \(J\) can be extended to a \(\kappa\)-complete ultrafilteron \(X\).
Lemma: (\(ZFC\)) Every strongly compact cardinal is measurable.
Definition:
Definition:
Lemma: \((ZFC)\) Every supercompact cardinal is strongly compact.
Lemma: Form 319 implies Form 320. (Use [0 AJ].)
Definition: \(\kappa\) is a Ramsey cardinal iff \(\kappa\to(\kappa)^{<\omega}\).
Lemma: Every measurable cardinal is a Ramsey cardinal.
Definition: A cardinal \(\kappa\) is called a Rowbottom cardinal iff, whenever
\(\frak A =\) \(\langle A, U,\cdots\rangle\) is a structure of countable length, where \(|A|=\kappa\), \(U\subset A\),and \(|U|<\kappa\), then \(\frak A\) has an elementary substructure \(\frak B = \langle B, U',\cdots\rangle\) with\(|\frak B|=\kappa\) and \(|U'|\le\aleph_0\).
Lemma: Every Ramsey cardinal is a Rowbottom cardinal.
Definition: A cardinal \(\kappa\) is said to be almost huge iff there is an \(n\in\omega\) and a cardinal \(\lambda>\kappa\), a \(\kappa\)-additive normal ultrafilter \(U\) on\(2^{\lambda}\), and a sequence \(\kappa=\lambda_0<\lambda_1<\cdots<\lambda_n=\lambda\) such that for each \(i \le n\), \(\{x\subseteq \lambda:x\cap\lambda_{i+1}=\lambda_i\}\in U\).
Lemma: Every almost huge cardinal is supercompact.
In a series of papers (Apter [1985b], Apter [1988], Apter [1990], Apter [1992] and Apter/Henle [1991]), various consistency results about large cardinals are obtained. We give some examples below.
In Bull [1978], besides Form 321, there are the following consistency results.
Let \(S\) and \(S'\) be the following statements:
Howard-Rubin number: 20
Type: Proofs and statements
Back