Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

214 \(\Rightarrow\) 288-n given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
214 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 10	Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 322
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 288-n	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
214:	\(Z(\omega)\): For every family \(A\) of infinite sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in A\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty subset of \(y\) and \(\|f(y)\|=\aleph_{0}\).
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
10:	\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
288-n:	If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(\aleph_0,n)\): Every denumerable set of \(n\)-element sets has a choice function.

Comment:

Back