We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
395 \(\Rightarrow\) 397 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
395: | \(MC(LO,LO)\): For each linearly ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\). |
397: | \(MC(WO,LO)\): For each well ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\). |
Comment: