Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

214 \(\Rightarrow\) 249
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
214 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 322
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 249

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
214:

\(Z(\omega)\): For every family \(A\) of infinite sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in A\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty subset of \(y\) and \(|f(y)|=\aleph_{0}\).

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

249:

If \(T\) is an infinite tree in which every element has exactly 2 immediate successors then \(T\) has an infinite branch.

Comment:

Back