We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
122: | \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
80: | \(C(\aleph_{0},2)\): Every denumerable set of pairs has a choice function. |
Comment: