We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

59-le \(\Rightarrow\) 105
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
59-le \(\Rightarrow\) 105 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
59-le:

If \((A,\le)\) is a partial ordering that is not a well ordering, then there is no set \(B\) such that \((B,\le)\) (the usual injective cardinal ordering on \(B\)) is isomorphic to \((A,\le)\).
Mathias [1979], p 120.

105:

There is a  partially ordered set \((A,\le)\) such that for no set \(B\) is \((B,\le)\) (the ordering  on \(B\) is the usual injective cardinal ordering) isomorphic to \((A,\le)\).

Comment:

Back