We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | clear |
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 342-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
4: | Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).) |
9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite. |
342-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): Every infinite family of \(n\)-element sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. (See Form 166.) |
Comment: