Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

165 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
165 \(\Rightarrow\) 122	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
165:	\(C(WO,WO)\):  Every well ordered family of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function.
122:	\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

Comment: