We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 231 \(\Rightarrow\) 151 | clear | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 231: | \(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable.  | 
					
| 151: | \(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see note 27 for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).)  | 
					
Comment: