Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

394 \(\Rightarrow\) 397
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
394 \(\Rightarrow\) 397 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
394:

\(C(WO,LO)\): Every well ordered set of non-empty linearly orderable sets has a choice function.

397:

\(MC(WO,LO)\): For each well ordered family of non-empty linearly orderable sets \(X\), there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\) \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\).

Comment:

Back