We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
399 \(\Rightarrow\) 400 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
399: | \(KW(\infty,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a set of linearly orderable sets: For every set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
400: | \(KW(LO,LO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets: For every linearly ordered set of linearly orderable sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: