We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 104 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
34: | \(\aleph_{1}\) is regular. |
104: | There is a regular uncountable aleph. Jech [1966b], p 165 prob 11.26. |
Comment: