We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
23 \(\Rightarrow\) 207-alpha | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
23: | \((\forall \alpha)(UT(\aleph_{\alpha},\aleph_{\alpha}, \aleph_{\alpha}))\): For every ordinal \(\alpha\), if \(A\) and every member of \(A\) has cardinality \(\aleph_{\alpha}\), then \(|\bigcup A| = \aleph _{\alpha }\). |
207-alpha: | \(UT(\aleph_{\alpha },\aleph_{\alpha}, <2^{\aleph_{\alpha }})\): The union of \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) sets each of cardinality \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) has cardinality less than \(2^{\aleph_{\alpha}}\). |
Comment: