We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 64
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 64

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

64:

\(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)

Comment:

Back