We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 111
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 111

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

111:

\(UT(WO,2,WO)\): The union of an infinite well ordered set of 2-element sets is an infinite well ordered set.

Comment:

Back