Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 132
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 132

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

132:

\(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\):  Every infinite family of finite  sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function.

Comment:

Back