Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 212
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 212

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

212:

\(C(2^{\aleph_{0}},\subseteq{\Bbb R})\): If \(R\) is a relation on \({\Bbb R}\) such that for all \(x\in{\Bbb R}\), there is a \(y\in{\Bbb R}\) such that \(x\mathrel R y\), then there is a function \(f: {\Bbb R} \rightarrow{\Bbb R}\) such that for all \(x\in{\Bbb R}\), \(x\mathrel R f(x)\).

Comment:

Back