We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 260
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 260

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

260:

\(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.

Comment:

Back