We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

1 \(\Rightarrow\) 264
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
1 \(\Rightarrow\) 264

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
1:

\(C(\infty,\infty)\):  The Axiom of Choice: Every  set  of  non-empty sets has a choice function.

264:

\(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set.

Comment:

Back