Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

4 \(\Rightarrow\) 98
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 98 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
4:

Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).)

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

98:

The set of all finite subsets of a Dedekind finite set is Dedekind finite. Jech [1973b] p 161 prob 11.5.

Comment:

Back