Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

56 \(\Rightarrow\) 0 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
56 \(\Rightarrow\) 0

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
56:	\(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{0}})\neq\aleph_{\omega}\). (\(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{0}})\) is Hartogs' aleph, the least \(\aleph\) not \(\le 2^{\aleph_{0}}\).) Mathias [1979], p 125.
0:	\(0 = 0\).

Comment: