Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

59-le \(\Rightarrow\) 0 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
59-le \(\Rightarrow\) 0

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
59-le:	If \((A,\le)\) is a partial ordering that is not a well ordering, then there is no set \(B\) such that \((B,\le)\) (the usual injective cardinal ordering on \(B\)) is isomorphic to \((A,\le)\). Mathias [1979], p 120.
0:	\(0 = 0\).

Comment: