We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

104 \(\Rightarrow\) 0
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
104 \(\Rightarrow\) 0

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
104:

There is a regular uncountable aleph. Jech [1966b], p 165 prob 11.26.

0:  \(0 = 0\).

Comment:

Back